From the Stone series of the online edition of the New York Times, November 20, 2011.
In just a few days, we will once again endure the annual spectacle of the president of the United States pardoning a turkey that would otherwise have been fated for the Thanksgiving table. This event is typically covered in the media as a light-hearted bit of fluff — and fluff is what it might well be, if there were not actual humans on death row awaiting similar intervention. In the current American context, however, the turkey pardon is a distasteful parody of the strange power vested in politicians to decide the earthly fates of death-row prisoners. There is in it an implicit acknowledgment that the killing of these prisoners is a practice that bears real, non-jocular comparison to the ritual slaughter of birds for feasts.
I am not saying that this slaughter of birds for food is wrong ― not here anyway ― but only that the parallel the presidential ritual invites us to notice is revealing...
To continue reading, please go here.
Execution by lethal injection is these days commonly described in the
media as 'putting to death' (e.g., an AP article of June 28, 2006
announces: "'Railroad Killer' Put to Death in Texas"). This phrase,
along with the more overtly veterinary 'putting down', seems to suggest
that the creature in question is only being relieved of its misery,
that it is a being morally and biologically ready for death, and that
the operation performed upon it is really just a facilitation of the
inevitable. The moral acceptability, even the necessity, of the act is
built into the term used to describe it. And the result of this
semantic legerdemain is a passive assumption on the part of the public
that lethal injection agrees with our sense of the sanctity of life and
of the importance of compassionate death for all, while hangings,
firing-squads, electric chairs, guillotines, and gas chambers are, in
contrast, distant memories from our barbaric past.